
 |
|
Above: Scene of Madrid attack, 3/11/04
Below: Scene
of Ashdod attack, 3/14/04
|
|
For over three years, in continual
alerts and
through TerrorPetition.com, HonestReporting has led the campaign to insist that
news outlets call Palestinian terror "terror." (See our extensive
webpage devoted to this issue.) Now, as the scourge of
Islamic terrorism continues to spread throughout the globe, it is more
important than ever that Israel's struggle against terrorism be
properly identified as part of the larger battle to preserve civil, democratic
society against militant Islam.
The past week saw the horrific bombing of commuter trains in Madrid, and the Palestinian terror attack at the Israeli seaport at Ashdod. While the bombings in Madrid were of
greater magnitude in terms of human loss, in essence the two were very
similar terror attacks ― targeting sensitive areas of national
infrastructure with the goal of destroying the opposing society.
This time,
while some news agencies continued to show a double standard vis-a-vis
Israel, we're pleased to report that others are beginning to heed
HonestReporting's insistent call to refer to Palestinian
terror as "terror." Here's a review, starting with the duplicitous offenders:
|
News Agency |
Coverage of
Madrid bombings |
Coverage
of Ashdod bombings |
|
Associated
Press |
Headlined 'Terror Blasts Kill at
Least 198 in Spain' |
Headlined 'Eight Die in Israeli Port Suicide Attack' |
|
Washington Post |
"Millions of
Spaniards united... to denounce
the terrorist attacks that killed nearly 200 people in the capital
a day earlier." (link) |
"Two Palestinian suicide bombers blew
themselves up at one of Israel's largest industrial seaports late
Sunday afternoon..." (link) |
|
BBC |
Interviewed politicians regarding the "Madrid terror attack"
(link) |
Reported "the suicide blasts in the southern Israeli port of
Ashdod." |
|
Agence France-Presse
(AFP) |
"..investigators
probed a claim that the Al-Qaeda network was behind the deadliest
terror attacks in Spain's history." (link) |
"Two explosions
in ... Ashdod were carried out in a joint operation by the
hardline Palestinian groups Hamas and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs
Brigades" (link) |
|
LA Times |
"The body bags outside Madrid's
Atocha train station and the commuters sitting stunned on the
tracks were graphic reminders of terrorism's evil." (link) |
"Two Palestinian militant
organizations, Hamas and the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, claimed
joint responsibility for the attack" (link) |
Meanwhile, the New York Times, CNN, The
Christian Science Monitor and even London's The Guardian are to be
commended for breaking from past policies and calling both attacks "terrorism":
|
News Agency |
Coverage of
Madrid bombings |
Coverage
of Ashdod bombings |
|
New York Times |
"when
terrorists blew up commuter trains packed with run-of-the-mill
people...suddenly the equation changed." (link) |
" If the
terrorists did come from Gaza, south of here, it would be the
first time in more than three years of conflict ..." (link) |
|
CNN |
"One of the
five men identified Sunday as suspects in last week's terrorist
attacks in Madrid..." (link) |
"Hamas and the Al
Aqsa Martyrs Brigades...claimed joint responsibility for the
terror attacks" (link) |
|
Christian
Science Monitor |
"Terrorist
Bombings Jolt Spain"
(link) |
"It was not the first time terrorism
exerted its veto power over attempts to lure Israelis and
Palestinians back to discussions" (link) |
|
The Guardian |
"...the terrorists behind the
March 11 attack have ties to a radical Islamist group..." (link) |
"It was also the first time
that militants from Gaza have staged a terrorist attack" (link) |
[And of course, the "news"
agency Reuters held by their absurd editorial standard to refer to no attack
as "terrorism" ― they
called the Spanish bombs a "guerilla attack."]
We reiterate that this is not merely an
academic,
semantic issue. As the West unites against barbaric Islamic terrorism
that now also haunts continental Europe, it is essential that Israel's struggle
against Palestinian terror be properly identified as part of the
larger battle. When news outlets differentiate between a port attack
in Israel and a train attack in Madrid, they expose an editorial
decision that the Palestinian attack is somehow more justified.
That's wrong, dangerous, and far from "neutral reporting."It is
encouraging indeed that four major news outlets have responded to the
hundreds of emails sent by HonestReporting subscribers, and have
finally begun calling Palestinian terror "terror." Now is the time
to write to the other news agencies above, encouraging them to join
their colleagues in rectifying this longstanding anti-Israel double
standard.
Comments to Associated Press:
feedback@ap.org
Comments to Washington Post:
letters@washpost.com
Comments to BBC:
newsonline@bbc.co.uk
Comments to AFP:
contact@afp.com
Comments to LA Times:
letters@latimes.com
STUDY: SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS
Kudos to
HonestReporting subscribers Andrew and Michelle Gross, whose
newly-released 5-month study of the San Jose Mercury News (available
on the HR site
here) focuses on precisely this problem of biased terror reportage when it comes to Israel.
The study found that during the
period of August 1 ― December 31, 2003, 108 headlines and
125 lead paragraphs in the Mercury News applied the 'terror' term to
specific acts of violence, aggressors, countermeasures, and legal
procedures in China India, Indonesia, Iraq, Russia, Turkey, the United
States, and elsewhere. But in reporting on nine major terrorist
attacks in Israel during this time, the Mercury News
never used 'terrorism' in a headline, and only once used the
term in an actual article. The conclusion:
Mercury News terminology gives readers the
impression that the global scourge of terrorism does not affect
Israel. While the newspaper routinely identifies acts of terror
and anti-terror actions around the globe, similar acts within Israel
are not labeled as such. Moreover, while Al Qaida and allied groups
are consistently identified as terrorist organizations, Palestinian
groups with parallel goals, targets, and methods are not. This
double standard should be unacceptable to a newspaper that declares
as its mission, "reporting and writing accurately and fairly."
If you have observed a similar pattern in your local
paper, use the Grosses' fine study as a model to produce your own study. For
more information, see the HonestReporting guide:
'Become a Media Patroller,' as well as HonestReporting's
expose of the media's use of the "T-word."
Thank you for your ongoing involvement in the battle against media bias.