The
Associated Press has reported on the movement within FIFA, the world
governing body of soccer, to criticize Israel for an air strike against
an empty soccer field in the Gaza strip. The air strike was an Israeli response
to the continuing barrage of
Qassam rockets that Palestinians have been firing at Israel. However, the AP
report, that has been
republished around the world, fails to highlight the double standard FIFA is
employing by ignoring a Palestinian attack against an Israeli soccer field
just one week before.
We commend Tom Gross, the former
Jerusalem correspondent for the London Sunday Telegraph and the New York Daily News,
for the following insightful article. Tom's original
National
Review Online article can be viewed online by clicking
here.
----------------------------------------------------------------
April 11, 2006, 1:11 p.m.
Football Killing Fields
Outrage and disbelief as world soccer body condemns Israel, not Hamas.
By Tom Gross
Israel is used to being singled out for unjust criticism and subjected to
startling double standards by the United Nations, the European Union, much of
the Western media and numerous academic bodies. But now FIFA, the supposedly
nonpolitical organization that governs the world's most popular sport, soccer,
is getting in on the act as well.
FIFA has condemned Israel for an air strike on an empty soccer field in the Gaza
Strip that was used for training exercises by Islamic Jihad and the al-Aqsa
Martyrs Brigade. This strike did not cause any injuries. But at the same time
FIFA has refused to condemn a Palestinian rocket attack on an Israeli soccer
field last week which did cause injuries.
With the soccer World Cup, which takes place only once every four years, just
weeks away, it is a time of mounting emotion for the hundreds of millions of
people across the globe who passionately follow the game.
As FIFA meets in the next few days to decide what action to take against Israel,
the double standards involved could not be more obvious. Up to now FIFA, which
sees itself as a purely sporting body, has gone out of its way to avoid
politics, and has refrained from criticizing even the most appalling
human-rights abuses connected to soccer players and stadiums.
NOT A WORD ABOUT SADDAM AND THE TALIBAN
When Saddam Hussein's son Uday had Iraqi soccer players tortured in 1997 after
they failed to qualify for the 1998 FIFA World Cup Finals in France, FIFA
remained silent. Uday, who was chairman of the Iraqi soccer association, had
star players tortured again in 1998. And in 2000, following a quarterfinal
defeat in the Asia Cup, three Iraqi players were whipped and beaten for three
days by Uday's bodyguards. The torture took place at the Iraqi Olympic Committee
headquarters, but FIFA said nothing.
Again, FIFA simply looked the other way while the Taliban used U.N.-funded
soccer fields to slaughter and flog hundreds of innocent people who had
supposedly violated sharia law in front of crowds of thousands chanting "God is
great." (Afghan soccer coach Habib Ullahniazi said that as many as 30 people
were executed in the middle of the field during the intermissions of a single
soccer match at Kabul's Ghazi Stadium.)
FIFA equally failed to speak out when soccer stadiums in Argentina were turned
into jails.
AND CHILE AND CHECHNYA
FIFA's silence was no less deafening when, according to the International Red
Cross, about 7,000 prisoners were detained (and some tortured) in Chile's
national soccer stadium after Augusto Pinochet seized power in 1973.
Nor did the organization threaten Russia with sanctions after Chechen president
Akhmad Kadyrov was murdered by a bomb explosion at Grozny's Dynamo stadium.
As for the Middle East, FIFA refused to criticize the decision to name a
Palestinian soccer tournament after a suicide terrorist who murdered 31 people
at a Passover celebration at the Park Hotel in Netanya in 2002. (At the
tournament, organized under Yasser Arafat's auspices in 2003, the brother of the
suicide bomber was given the honorary role of distributing the trophies to the
winning team.)
FIFA also failed to condemn the suicide bomb at the Maxim restaurant in Haifa in
October 2003 which injured three officials from the leading Israeli soccer team
Maccabi Haifa.
ISRAEL IS DIFFERENT...
But then last week, FIFA finally found a target worthy of its outrage, and
leapt into action. That target was Israel.
The international governing body for soccer condemned the Jewish state, and
announced that it was considering possible action over the Israeli air strike
last week on the Gaza soccer field that had been used for terrorist training
exercises. The field, which had also reportedly served as a missile launching
pad, was empty at the time; the strike itself came in response to the continuing
barrage of Qassam rocket attacks directed at Israeli towns and villages.
Only a couple of days earlier, one of those Qassam rockets landed on a soccer
field at the Karmiya kibbutz in southern Israel, causing light injuries to one
person. Several other Israeli children and adults needed to be treated for
shock. The attack was claimed by the Al-Quds brigades, an armed wing of Islamic
Jihad. The soccer pitch is regularly used by children and it was only a matter
of luck that there were not greater injuries. (Since Israel's withdrawal from
Gaza last year, several members of the kibbutz, including a ten-month-old baby,
have been wounded after their homes took direct hits from Qassams. Israelis
elsewhere have died after being hit by these weapons.)
... BUT NOT QASSAM ROCKETS
In an interview with the Jerusalem Post, Jerome Champagne, FIFA's deputy general
secretary, who had personally condemned the attack on the Palestinian soccer
pitch, refused to extend a similar condemnation to the attack on the Israeli
pitch.
Champagne said he had discussed the matter with FIFA president Sepp Blatter and
that a decision on what action to take against Israel would be announced soon.
Champagne, a French national, also sent an official letter to the Israeli
ambassador to Switzerland. (FIFA is based in Zurich.)
A FIFA condemnation of Israel is no small matter. The incredible passions that
soccer arouses in most countries around the globe seem to have few boundaries.
For example, it was said that the only time the guns fell silent during the
Lebanese civil war was during the 1982 World Cup matches.
Individual Israelis, outraged by FIFA's blatantly one-sided decision, have been
sending e-mails to FIFA asking why "they care more about the grass on an empty
soccer pitch than the human lives saved by strikes on the Qassam launching
pads."
ANTI-SEMITIC BANNERS AND CHANTS
They have also asked where FIFA is when anti-Semitic banners go up in European
soccer stadiums, and there are chants from spectators about sending Jews to the
gas? And where, they wonder, are the FIFA sanctions against the Arab or Asian
countries that refuse to allow Israel to compete in Asia?
Other questions have been raised, too -- why, for instance, FIFA has moved games
from Israel because guest teams were afraid to come to Israel, but has never
banned any other national teams from playing home games on account of local
Islamic violence. Indonesia, Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey were allowed to continue
playing matches at home.
In response to some of this criticism Champagne -- perhaps unaware of the
phenomena of some radical Jews being at the forefront of whipping up hate
against the Jewish state -- wrote to the Jerusalem Post saying he couldn't
possibly be biased against Israel because his wife was Jewish.
AP FAILS TO MENTION QASSAM ATTACK
In its widely circulated report on the FIFA condemnation of Israel, the
Associated Press also failed to mention the Qassam rocket attack on the Israeli
soccer pitch. As a result, and not for the first time, AP gave its readers
around the globe an unbalanced impression of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The popularity of soccer ensured AP's story was used by dozens of news outlets
--
among others,
Al-Jazeera, CBC News of Canada, and the
Los Angeles Times. (HR Editor's Note: See also the
Washington Post and
USA Today for more reprints). Only the Israeli press mentioned the Qassam
attack on the kibbutz Karmiya soccer pitch, an attack which the Islamic Jihad
website admits to carrying out.
"WE ARE NOT IN POLITICS"
The outrage felt in soccer-mad Israel at these astonishing double standards is
all the greater since FIFA president Sepp Blatter has made it clear that FIFA
should not become involved in politics. Following calls last December from
German politicians that Iran should be banned from participating in the
forthcoming World Cup (which starts in Germany on June 9, 2006) because of
repeated Holocaust denial by the Iranian president, Blatter said "We're not
going to enter into any political declarations. We in football, if we entered
into such discussions, then it would be against our statutes. We are not in
politics."
Indeed so emboldened does Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad now feel by
FIFA's support that he announced last week that he will likely attend Iran's
opening match against Mexico in Nuremberg on June 11. Holocaust denial is a
serious crime punishable by a prison term of up to five years in Germany, but
Ahmadinejad no doubt feels that powerful international bodies like FIFA will
protect him.
A BLIND EYE TO DUBAI
Meanwhile FIFA (and other sporting bodies) continually turn a blind eye to
boycotts of Israeli sportsmen.
In February, Tal Ben Haim -- the Israeli national soccer team captain, who plays
his club soccer for the English Premiership team Bolton Wanderers --was banned
from joining his Bolton teammates for their training matches in Dubai. FIFA
pointedly ignored this. So did Bolton despite the fact that the team claims to
be among the leaders of the campaign to "Kick racism out of football" in the
U.K.
Only last week, another English club, West Ham, left their two Israeli players,
Yossi Benayoun and Yaniv Katan, at home when they went to Dubai. FIFA naturally
had nothing to say.
Whilst Israel is often slandered as an "apartheid state," (despite having
several Arabs playing in its national team), Dubai has received no criticism for
what appears to be a clear "apartheid" policy.
Indeed, were Israel allowed to compete against other Asian teams for a World Cup
berth, rather than against the likes of England and France, the relatively
strong Israeli team would most probably have been able to qualify for this
year's World Cup.
RONALDINHO AIDS TERROR VICTIMS
Not all is rotten in world soccer. Some individuals still seem to know right
from wrong. Last week, Ronaldinho, the Brazilian superstar widely regarded as
the best current player in the world, donated signed footballs and shirts to
Israeli child suicide bomb survivors, saying he hoped his gifts would "warm the
hearts of the children who have suffered so much."
But FIFA, meanwhile, apparently thinks it is acceptable for Palestinian terror
groups to continue targeting such Israeli children, firing missiles from the
Gaza Strip, even though Israel has left the area.
Tom Gross is the former Jerusalem correspondent for the London Sunday
Telegraph and New York Daily News. Among his previous pieces for NRO is "Jeningrad".)
---------------------------------------------------------
While HonestReporting's mission is to monitor and respond to media bias
against Israel, we encourage our members to also respond when influential
individuals and organizations also demonstrate a double standard when it comes
to Israel and Israeli actions.
To write to FIFA, click on
contact@fifa.org
To write to the Associated Press, click
Feedback@ap.org.
HonestReporting. com