A cursory examination
reveals Sharon to be more an unindicted war
criminal than a peacemaker. His bloody record
has been extensively documented by British
journalist David Hirst, Israeli sociologist
Baruch Kimmerling, and several others. However,
rather than being placed in the dock at the
International Criminal Court, Sharon is now
receiving effusive praise from Western elites
for his commitment to peace. (Scott
Burchill, The Australian, 11 Jan 2006)
One
of the most pervasive myths appearing in the
international media is the accusation that Ariel
Sharon's September 2000 visit to the Temple Mount
was responsible for the outbreak of Palestinian
violence against Israel. Some
news outlets have swallowed this distortion:
In September 2000, he made
a provocative visit to al-Aqsa mosque compound
in Jerusalem, regarded by Jews as the site of
their ancient temple. Having thus ignited the
Palestinian uprising, he was propelled to power
five months later on a promise to crush the
revolt. (Daily Telegraph,
6 Jan 2006)
His provocative visit to
the Temple Mount in October 2000 undid the work
of Rabin and Ehud Barak and triggered the
second, and deadlier, Palestinian intifada.
(South Africa
Sunday Times, 8 Jan 2006)
This particular peace
strategy ceased to exist on the day in 2000 when
Mr Sharon ventured onto the precincts of the al-Aqsa
mosque in Jerusalem (known to Jews as the Temple
Mount) and sparked off a new intifada. (John
Simpson,
BBC News Online, 9 Jan 2006)
This, despite the evidence to the
contrary as stated by members of the Palestinian
leadership themselves:
Whoever thinks that the
Intifada broke out because of the despised
Sharon's visit to the Al-Aqsa Mosque is wrong..
. . This Intifada was planned in advance, ever
since President Arafat's return from the Camp
David negotiations, where he turned the table
upside down on President Clinton.
(Palestinian Communications Minister Imad Al-Faluji,
Al-Safir, 3 March 2001. Translated by
MEMRI)
In addition, the
Mitchell Report submitted by the investigatory
committee set up to look into the causes of the
outbreak of violence concluded:
The Sharon visit did not
cause the Al-Aqsa Intifada.
SABRA AND SHATILA
A charge also leveled at Sharon is
the claim that he is responsible for the massacre of
thousands of Palestinians in the Sabra and Shatila
refugee camps during the 1982 Lebanon War, an
inaccuracy echoed by a number of media outlets:
Sharon's political nadir was the massacres
in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra
and Shatilla by allied Christian Lebanese
militias, whom the Israelis had brought up
to do the killing.
(H.D.S.
Greenway, The Boston Globe, 10 Jan 2006)
...This, after all, was the
man who, until very recently, was regarded as
an international pariah, the 'Butcher of
Beirut,' the man ultimately responsible for the
appalling atrocities that took place at the
Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps in
Lebanon in 1982. (Con Coughlin,
The Daily Telegraph, 6 Jan 2006)
In fact, as detailed by
Mitchell Bard's Myths & Facts, the killings were
carried out by the Lebanese Christian Phalangist
militia (whose members have still not been held
accountable). Israel's own Kahane Commission found
that Israel and Ariel Sharon were indirectly
responsible for not anticipating the possibility of
Phalangist violence. Sharon thus resigned his
position as Defense Minister.
A MEDIA U-TURN OR GROSS
HYPOCRISY?
While the late conversion
of some media outlets to a more balanced and fairer
treatment of Sharon is welcome, HonestReporting
notes how the media's attitude throughout Sharon's career has been infected with opinion and prejudice
that has significantly contributed to the campaign of demonization against Israel.
As illustrated by some of the examples in this
communique, this trend still exists in many quarters.
The sudden u-turn of many of Sharon's detractors
demonstrates the fickleness of a media that has
promoted its own opinion of the truth with utter
disregard for the consequences. This power to shape
perceptions and mould public opinion reinforces the
need to hold the media accountable for its work.
The thoughts of
HonestReporting are with Ariel
Sharon and his family
and we urge readers to remain vigilant and to
respond to further media
distortions of his
history. (See the
Jewish Virtual Library for a detailed
biography.)
Thank you for your ongoing involvement in the battle
against media bias.