The 2003
'road map' agreement
remains the critical document outlining each side's obligations toward
peaceful resolution of the Mideast conflict. Stage one of the road map
obligates the Palestinian Authority to commence
sustained, targeted, and effective operations aimed at confronting all those
engaged in terror and dismantlement of terrorist capabilities and
infrastructure.
By his own
admission, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has not complied with this
requirement, choosing instead to elicit a conditional cease-fire from the terrorist groups, and
offering
Hamas representation in the next PA government.
On the Israeli side, a recent
government report
indicated that Israel has also not yet fulfilled its road map obligations to
end settlement activity and dismantle recently erected outposts.
But look what happens to the two sides' obligations in this March 28
Reuters report on EU criticism of Israeli settlement building:
Israel is supposed to halt all settlement activity in the first phase [of the
road map], in return for security measures to end violence which new
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is implementing.
Reuters asserts that Abbas 'is implementing' Palestinian road map obligations,
while Israel has failed to comply. Reuters thereby lowers the bar on Abbas' actual, all-important stage one obligation ―
to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure.
Back in the Oslo Years (1991-2000), similar media maneuvers
― demanding strict and immediate Israeli compliance with
commitments while creatively redefining simultaneous Palestinian
obligations ― were one of the key reasons for the breakdown of understanding
and descent to violence. If real progress is to be made this time around, the
media must accurately represent both sides' official commitments.
Comments to Reuters: editor@reuters.com
* * *
Reuters isn't the only media outlet redefining the road
map to assign blame solely upon Israel. A March 23
New York Times editorial heaped criticism on Ariel Sharon with no mention
whatsoever of Mahmoud Abbas' non-compliance with the agreement.
HonestReporting subscriber and blogger
David Gerstman
produced a creative rewriting of this Times editorial to illustrate how Times
editors might have worded their critique with the exact opposite focus. We reproduce
excerpts here, side-by-side:
|
New York Times
Editorial
(view
full) |
'Alternative version
'
(view
full) |
|
Maybe Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel
doesn't quite get it yet, but this new era of hope in the Middle
East means he needs to restrain his instincts for settlement
building. |
Maybe President Mahmoud Abbas doesn't quite get it yet but this new era of
hope in the Middle East means he needs to restrain his instincts to excuse the
terror against Israel. |
|
Israel publicly confirmed
plans to expand [a settlement]... The Palestinians have rightly criticized
this as a major obstacle to ever resolving one of the most emotional and
intractable issues between the two: the final borders of Israel and eventually
Palestine, and the dividing up of Jerusalem. |
Mr. Abbas failed to get [terror groups] to give up their terror as anything
more than a temporary measure. Many Israelis have criticized this lack of
resolve and rightly accused the Palestinian terror organizations of being
insincere and seeking a chance to regroup rather than a commitment to the
political process. |
|
[Adding to settlements] right now is so cynical... [Sharon
gave] a slap in the face of the new Palestinian president. |
Mr. Abbas's cynical claims of having fulfilled
his obligations... may play well in the Arab street but it can
hardly inspire confidence in the Israeli public or those of us who
are serious about peace. |
|
Mr. Sharon deserves credit for the upcoming withdrawal of
Jewish settlements from the Gaza Strip... but building new settlements is the
wrong way to ease... political pressure. |
Mr. Abbas deserves credit for talking a good
game and decrying the use of violence. He now needs to back up his
words with strong actions and show that he means them. |
Comments to the New York Times:
letters@nytimes.com
In any endeavor, a false sense of reality inevitably leads to disappointment.
The media, by projecting a skewed picture of the Mideast peace process, can
jeopardize any possibility of a real breakthrough.
HonestReporting encourages subscribers to monitor your local media for
even-handed critique of road map compliance.
Thank you for your ongoing involvement in the battle against media bias.
HonestReporting