Palestinians
head to the polls on 25 January in an election
that many observers predict will see a significant show of
strength for Hamas.
Hamas has been responsible for the murders of hundreds
of Israeli civilians since the early 1990s and is officially
classified as a terrorist organization by the US and EU.
Indeed, the US has threatened to cut off funding for the
Palestinian Authority should it become dominated by Hamas.
If Hamas candidate Mariam Farhat's comments
to
The Times of London are any indication, it appears as if the
bullet and the ballot box are mutually compatible concepts
for the terror organization:
The mother regards her candidacy for the
Palestinian Legislative Council as a logical extension
of the armed struggle she encouraged her sons to die
for. She denies that Hamas's decision to join mainstream
Palestinian political life contradicts its military
goals.
"The jihadist project completes the political one
and the political project cannot be completed without
jihad," she says. "The resistance needs the political
project to support it through the legislative council."
Despite this, some media outlets have
softened their approach towards Hamas, emphasizing the
organization's apparent new "pragmatism" towards Israel.
The Guardian contends that:
Hamas has dropped its call for the
destruction of Israel from its manifesto for the
Palestinian parliamentary election in a fortnight, a
move that brings the group closer to the mainstream
Palestinian position of building a state within the
boundaries of the occupied territories.
In similar vein, the
Sunday Telegraph also speculates that:
though Hamas retains much of its spine-chilling
rhetoric towards Israel and remains committed to
regaining lost Palestinian land by force, a new
pragmatism is entering its outlook.
While
Hamas may very well be politically expedient with its aims
in order to garner more votes, the simple fact remains that
the organization retains its weapons and its desire to
destroy Israel, as clearly stated in its
Charter, replete with vicious anti-Semitism, which
remains in force to this day. Some examples of this text,
which rejects any moves towards peace and incites against
Jews,
include:
... Israel will rise and will
remain erect until Islam eliminates it...
Peace initiatives, so-called peaceful
solutions, and the international conferences to resolve
the Palestinian problem, are contrary to the beliefs of
the Islamic Resistance Movement.
Their [the Zionists'] scheme has been
laid out in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion...
This is only a small sample of a text that
includes
claims that the Jews control vast wealth and the media,
engineer revolutions and run "spying organizations" as well
as promoting moral corruption and drugs.
Despite the active participation of a terror
organization dedicated to its destruction, Israel has
allowed the Palestinian elections to go ahead,
stating:
the participation in the elections of terrorist
organizations, including Hamas, which calls for the
destruction of Israel, fundamentally impairs the
legitimacy of the elections and contravenes the interim
agreement, as it also does accepted international
criteria regarding the participation in elections of
parties that support violence and terrorism.
HonestReporting hopes that in the
lead up to the Palestinian elections, the media does
not bestow upon Hamas a level of political and
democratic legitimacy undeserving of such a terror
group. Readers are encouraged to respond to any such
examples that may appear.
PALESTINIAN MELTDOWN -
NEW YORK TIMES BLAMES ISRAEL
Meanwhile, as chaos reigns in the Gaza
Strip, Palestinian gunmen jockey for position and an
election threatens to bring Hamas to power, the
New
York Times finds the obvious target to blame -
Israel:
Any elected government
stands or falls on its ability to deliver
security and jobs, and the authority was left
unable to provide either. When Mr. Abbas came to
power and said the things Mr. Arafat could never
bring himself to say about Palestinian
violence's being counterproductive, Israel gave
him only marginal support. Israel is right to
press Mr. Abbas to follow up his words with
deeds, and to do more to crack down on terror,
starting with his own Fatah movement. But
Israelis also need to recognize that he is not
politically or militarily strong enough at this
time to achieve victory.
When even the EU is
withholding funding to the PA, citing a lack of
budgetary discipline, isn't it about time that the
New York Times recognizes that Israel is not
responsible for every failing within the PA or its
leadership?
Comments to the New York Times:
letters@nytimes.com
Thank you for your ongoing involvement in the battle
against media bias.

HonestReporting